3 key forms of horizontal integration
Horizontal integration can be achieved in a few ways, each with its own advantages and challenges. The three main methods are mergers, acquisitions, and internal expansion.
Method 1: Merger
Mergers bring two companies together, combining resources, expertise, and customer bases into one stronger entity.
A good example of horizontal integration is the 2020 merger between Fiserv and First Data. This merger allowed Fiserve, a financial technology provider, to enhance its payment processing capabilities and broaden its customer base by integrating First Data’s expertise in merchant payment solutions.
For mid-sized businesses, mergers can accelerate growth, often reducing operational costs through shared resources and economies of scale. Merging with another company in the same industry can streamline processes—such as production, distribution, and administrative functions—enhancing efficiency and boosting profitability.
A merger offers immediate access to new markets and capabilities, allowing businesses to scale faster than they could through organic growth alone. But even with meticulous planning to harmonize differing cultures, systems, and workflows, some mergers face scrutiny for potentially taking options away from consumers.
Method 2: Acquisition
In an acquisition, one company fully buys another, integrating its assets, operations, and workforce to enhance market position and capabilities.
A notable example of horizontal consolidation through acquisitions is Salesforce’s acquisition of Tableau. This acquisition allowed Salesforce to integrate Tableau’s powerful data visualization and analytics platform into its broader suite of cloud-based business solutions, strengthening its position in the data-driven enterprise market.
Acquisitions offer mid-sized businesses a way to grow quickly by absorbing the acquired company’s customers, technology, and market presence. This can lead to faster market entry, streamlined operations, and access to new products or regions. Additionally, the acquiring company often retains its own brand name and control over strategic decisions, maintaining its identity and operational autonomy.
However, acquisitions can be challenging, often involving complex integration of goals, processes, and company cultures. Misalignment may lead to operational disruptions, increased costs, and a loss of key talent, potentially outweighing the expected benefits.