In 2016, Tennessee business owner Larry Thornton was sentenced to a year in prison and fined close to $10 million for his failure to pay over $8 million in employment taxes. Although his is a more extreme example of employment tax fraud, Thornton’s case is in line with the trend of fraud cases becoming more expensive, despite fewer cases being investigated.
In March 2017, the IRS watchdog, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, issued a report calling for a more focused strategy to deal with the shocking number of employment tax crimes. The report asserted the rate of these crimes—the willful failure to account for and deposit employment taxes—is on a steady incline. Although they say the number of employers conducting this type of fraud tripled in 17 years, there were 38% fewer assessments between 2010 and 2015, and fewer than 100 criminal convictions each year.
US employers pay over $5.5 billion each year
New research by QuickBooks Payroll has revealed the almost $123 billion cost of IRS penalties for employment tax violations since 1995. The study discovered US employers are paying more than $5.5 billion per year.
Employment tax violations more expensive, despite fewer cases
The latest data comes from 2016, the most costly year for employers since 2009—seeing a 41% annual increase from 2015 after a six-year decline. The annual cost of employment tax violations in 2016 reached more than $6 billion ($6,046,139,000). At the time of the study, data for 2017 had not yet been released by the IRS.
2016 saw a record high of $1,032 per violation, which is a 130% increase on the 1995 figure when the average cost per violation was just $449.
More costly tax violations
What these averages don’t reveal, however, is that some types of employment tax violations are far more costly than others.
Employment tax fraud the most expensive employment tax violation
The data shows employment tax fraud attracts the most heavy-handed response from the IRS compared to other violations. The average cost of an employment tax fraud violation is $23,598, compared to just $143 for bad check violations. The next most expensive type of violation, according to the IRS data, are tax estimation errors—costing $4,806 per violation on average. Tax errors follow closely behind in third place, costing employers $4,382 per violation.
Employment tax fraud
If we look more closely at employment tax fraud, we find the overall cost has trended downward over the past 22 years, while the average cost per violation has remained fairly constant, with fewer companies being prosecuted for fraud. In 2016, just 233 companies were prosecuted for employment tax fraud compared to a peak in 1996 of 562 companies. The highest annual cost of employment tax fraud came in 2007, at $21,845,000.
Tax estimation violations
Fines for tax estimation violations are on the decline, but the number of employers being prosecuted is not. The total annual cost of penalties for tax estimation violations has trended downward since 2005, dropping to $21,585 in 2016 (compared to a high of $51,030 in 2006) when the IRS assessed more than 8,000 penalties. Data prior to 2005 is not currently available.
Tax accuracy violations
It’s a similar story for tax accuracy violations. As with tax estimates, the cost of these violations appears to be on the decline—down to $3,409,000 in 2016 compared to a high of $22,601,000 in 2008. But at the same time, the number of violations being assessed by the IRS is trending upward.
Federal tax deposit violations
The annual cost of federal tax deposit violations has declined somewhat since 1995, especially since 2000 when the total cost of IRS penalties reached a peak of $5,758,696,000. In 2016 the cost of penalties was $3,086,402,000—a 46% drop.
Fewer federal assessments
The good news for business owners is, while the cost of each federal tax deposit violation is rising, the number of violations being assessed by the IRS has dropped significantly since 1995. Back then, the IRS found 4,265,042 violations compared to just 1,340,928 in 2016.
The number of penalties assessed for delinquency violations is also declining. In 1995, there were almost 2 million violations (1,977,825) compared to just over 1 million (1,098,732) in 2016.
Failure to pay violations
Compared to other types of employment tax violations, failure to pay penalties have a relatively low average cost, but they are the most common. For example, in 2016, the IRS assessed 3,144,623 failure to pay violations compared to just 233 for fraud. The numbers are, however, on the decline—down from a high of 4,620,927 in 2006.
Average violation costs on the rise
The logical conclusion of having fewer, more expensive violations for failing to pay employment tax is that average costs are rising. And the data shows this to be true. 2016 saw a record high in the average cost of failure to pay violations, reaching $365 compared to the 1995 low of $84.
Bad Check Violations
On average, of all the employment tax violations, bad checks cost employers the least. Violations for bad checks cost employers, on average, just $143. But they’re common. The IRS assessed 262,532 penalties in 2016 alone. The numbers have also been on the rise in recent years, peaking in 2014 with a 22-year high of 480,174 violations, compared to just 33,613 in 2010.
Employment Tax Fraud Not Worth the Risk
Beverly Lang is an accountant and QuickBooks trainer and consultant at her firm, Diversified Business Solutions.
Lang said the reason for the rise in the cost of employment tax fraud juxtaposed with the fewer incidences of prosecution could be due to the nature of the law.
“Employment tax fraud is a felony offense that is infrequently prosecuted,” said Lang. “The failure to collect or truthfully account for the tax must be willful, as must the failure to pay. There are so many gray areas that the offense must be big enough to warrant the costs associated with prosecution.”
Lang went on to say she thinks employers are more willing now than they were 10 years ago to test their luck due to their increased ability to pay a fine, lose your refund, or completely talk their way out of the infraction.
“I don’t think the consequences for employment tax fraud are as harsh as they were 10 years ago,” she said.
But that doesn’t mean she believes not meeting state and federal payroll compliance standards is worth the risk. “I always tell my clients that just because people have gotten away with it doesn’t mean they should try it,” said Lang. “The IRS is going to have to make a stand soon, and I don’t want them to be the company the IRS uses to make an example of.”