Two people in a factory standing.

FIFO vs. LIFO accounting: Which is best for your business?

As Canadian businesses evolve, understanding the nuances of inventory accounting methods becomes crucial. In this guide, we dive in to first in, first out (FIFO) and last in, first out (LIFO), among other inventory valuation approaches, highlighting their impact on Canadian businesses in the 2024 tax year.

Discover how choosing the right method can significantly affect your business's financial health.

Understanding FIFO and LIFO inventory methods

The FIFO meaning is straightforward: it assumes that the first items placed in inventory are sold first. This method aligns with the typical flow of goods and is widely preferred for its simplicity and consistency with physical inventory movement.

Conversely, the LIFO method, less common in Canada, assumes the last items added to inventory are sold first. While this can lead to lower taxable income during inflation, it may not always reflect the actual flow of goods.

Impact on Canadian businesses

The choice between inventory valuation methods can significantly influence your business's reported income and tax liabilities. FIFO typically results in higher inventory values, due to the way it accounts for the cost of goods sold (COGS) and remaining inventory, particularly in an inflationary economic environment. This can be beneficial in securing financing when lenders use inventory values as part of their lending criteria.

In an inflationary environment, the cost of goods tends to rise over time. Under FIFO, the oldest inventory — which was likely purchased at lower prices — is sold first. This means the amount recorded as COGS is lower because it reflects the cost of older inventory.

LIFO isn't allowed by the Canada Revenue Agency or under the International Financial Reporting Standards. This is because the most recently acquired or produced items are assumed to be sold first. This accounting practice contrasts with the way many businesses physically manage their inventory.

For businesses dealing with perishable goods, like food items, or products that become obsolete quickly, such as electronics, it's usually more practical to sell the oldest items first to prevent spoilage or obsolescence. In these cases, the FIFO method more accurately reflects the actual flow of goods.

FIFO vs. LIFO regulatory and tax considerations

The exclusion of LIFO as an acceptable inventory valuation method in Canada primarily stems from the Canadian accounting principles favouring a more realistic and conservative approach to inventory valuation.

As alluded to above, LIFO can lead to distorted inventory values and profit levels, especially in times of inflation. It often reports lower-end inventory values and higher costs of goods sold, which can artificially reduce reported profits and defer tax liabilities.

Canadian accounting standards emphasize a more accurate representation of inventory turnover and a consistent approach to the valuation of assets. This focus on realism and consistency in financial reporting is why FIFO is the preferred inventory method over LIFO under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Inventory valuation methods in Canada

Canadian businesses have other options if FIFO isn't a good fit. Businesses in Canada typically use one of three inventory valuation methods: specific identification, FIFO, and weighted average cost. Here's what to expect under each method. 

Specific identification

The specific identification method tracks each item of inventory individually. It is most suitable for businesses with unique, high-value items, such as jewelry stores and car sales lots. This method allows for precise matching of costs with revenues, but can be impractical for large inventories of similar items.

First in, first out (FIFO)

As mentioned previously, FIFO is a widely accepted method, especially useful for perishable goods or products with a limited shelf life. It assumes the first items purchased or produced are sold first, leading to a more accurate reflection of the cost of goods sold and current inventory value.

Weighted average cost (WAC)

The WAC method calculates the cost of goods sold and ending inventory based on the average cost of all items available for sale during a period. This method smooths out price fluctuations and is useful for businesses with large inventories of similar or identical items where individual tracking of each item is not feasible or practical, such as a gas station that sells fuel by the litre.

Each of these methods has its own advantages and is suitable for different types of businesses. The choice depends on the nature of the inventory, the business's operational practices, and the financial reporting requirements.

Making the right choice for your business

Choosing the appropriate inventory valuation method is a crucial decision for Canadian businesses. It affects financial reporting and tax implications, and it aligns with operational efficiencies.

The choice among these methods should be guided by the nature of your inventory, the industry in which you operate, and your business's specific financial goals. It’s important to consider how each method impacts your financial statements and tax reporting. 

Inventory valuation methods in action

Let's consider a fictional Canadian business, Maple Leaf Electronics, which operates both as a manufacturer and retailer of electronic gadgets. Maple Leaf Electronics produces a line of high-end, limited-edition smartwatches. For these unique items, the specific identification method is ideal. Each smartwatch has distinct characteristics and costs, making it easy to track their individual sales and calculate precise profit margins.

In its retail section, Maple Leaf Electronics sells a range of electronic accessories like headphones and chargers, which have a high turnover rate. Here, the FIFO method is more appropriate. It ensures that the accessories sold are accounted for at their original purchase cost, reflecting the actual physical movement of inventory and preventing any outdated stock from lingering unsold.

Additionally, Maple Leaf Electronics distributes bulk quantities of standard USB cables to various retailers. Given the large volume and uniformity of these cables, the WAC method is the most practical. This method allows Maple Leaf Electronics to average the cost of all USB cables over the year, smoothing out any variances due to fluctuating purchase prices and simplifying the accounting process.

Maple Leaf Electronics chooses the inventory valuation method that best aligns with the specific nature of its products and sales practices. This strategic selection ensures accurate financial reporting, compliance with Canadian accounting standards, and effective inventory management.

Remember, consistency is key in accounting practices. Once you choose a method, stick to it for comparability and compliance purposes.

Help for tracking inventory

Tools like QuickBooks can significantly aid in managing these accounting calculations and help ensure accuracy and compliance to Canadian accounting standards. They provide the flexibility to adapt to your chosen inventory valuation method while streamlining your financial management processes.

To manage your inventory effectively and make the most of tax deductions, consider leveraging QuickBooks' intuitive tools. Ready to streamline your inventory management? Learn more and empower your business with QuickBooks today.


This content is for information purposes only and should not be considered legal, accounting or tax advice, or a substitute for obtaining such advice specific to your business. Additional information and exceptions may apply. Applicable laws may vary by region, state or locality. No assurance is given that the information is comprehensive in its coverage or that it is suitable in dealing with a customer’s particular situation. Intuit does not have any responsibility for updating or revising any information presented herein. Accordingly, the information provided should not be relied upon as a substitute for independent research. Intuit does not warrant that the material contained herein will continue to be accurate nor that it is completely free of errors when published. Readers should verify statements before relying on them.

We provide third-party links as a convenience and for informational purposes only. Intuit does not endorse or approve these products and services, or the opinions of these corporations or organizations or individuals. Intuit accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, legality, or content on these sites.

Related Articles

Looking for something else?

Get QuickBooks

Smart features made for your business. We've got you covered.

Firm of the Future

Expert advice and resources for today’s accounting professionals.

QuickBooks Support

Get help with QuickBooks. Find articles, video tutorials, and more.