AR Transaction differences in CASH vs ACCRUAL
The Problem
Our balance sheet shows 2 different values for AR based on if it is run in Cash vs Accrual mode. Cash mode has a much higher AR balance vs Accrual as only one type of "revenue in" transaction (bank deposits recorded as payments against journal entries) is being recognized in the Cash list of transactions that reduce AR.
The Question
Trying to figure out the reason for the differences. I understand Cash (when you actually receive payment) vs Accrual (when you recognize the revenue via the Invoice date). (Yes, those are simplied explainations of Cash vs Accrual I know). But I don't understand why, when I click on the Balance Sheet AR account to see the detailed transactions, some of those transactions show up in the Cash transactions, some in the Accrual list of transactions, and some show up in both. Note I'm a business owner, not an accountant and just trying to learn/understand what is going on and how to correct the way we're recording revenue payments.
Summary of which transactions show in which list (Accrual vs Cash):
| Accrual | Cash | Comments | |
| Invoices | X | Expected | |
| Invoice Payments | X | Expected | |
| Journal Entries | X | X | Thought would only show in Accrual |
| Bank Deposits (Recorded as Deposits) | X | Thought would show in Cash only | |
| Bank Deposits (Recorded as Payments) | X | X | Thought would show in Accrual only |
Details
We track AR and Payments differently for 2 different types of customers: Individuals and Businesses.
Individuals as Customers
We have a software system we use that manages customer billing for individuals. It posts journal entries weekly to debit AR and credit services revenue. These Journal Entries show up in both ACCRUAL and CASH transaction lists. Then bank EFT deposits are recorded as a DEPOSIT Received From "Individual" to account AR. These show up in the ACCRUAL transaction list and not the CASH transaction list. This confuses me, I'd expect the opposite as it is a simple deposit not tied to any prior revenue recognition transaction like an Invoice.
Sometimes QB had matched the bank deposit amount to an outstanding Journal Entry and suggested it to be a payment, which I accepted, so it recorded it as a PAYMENT to that journal entry. In this case, these show up in the CASH transaction list, but not the ACCRUAL (opposite of above DEPOSIT scenario).
So should we always record bank deposits that represent individual payments as PAYMENTS to these journal entries instead of simply DEPOSITS with a Received From: Individual?
Business Customers
For these, we create explicit invoices and record payments. These both (Invoice and Payment) only show in the ACCRUAL list of transactions (which is what I'd expect).